I talk to lots of people interested in the Christian movie market, lots of young people. There’s a lot of older people too, but there’s a new generation of folks interested in getting involved in what they see as the “Christian Film Industry.” Well, I figured I would try to clear up some assumptions about how things work and what I think is possible and what is not. Some will find it offensive saying I’m “limiting what God can do,” but most of those folks end up being the very people who have investors yelling at them because they spent too much on something they couldn’t sell in the first place. Offended already? Good, now lets continue.
Bottom line, unless the budgets of the films you’re working on are high enough to pay you decent for your time, don’t expect to make much unless their profits are significant. It’s the age old problem of balancing investment and returns. If you spend $100,000 on a small character driven drama with a tiny crew who gets paid for their time (decent but not amazing rates) and let them go, and pay your actors a decent rate of maybe $100 / day, then there’s not much left for you if you’ve already considered a marketing budget inside that $100,000, equipment rentals (if any), your score, initial copies being made if you’re selling them yourself, etc. The reason to make a sub $100k film or $50k film is to just simply get the movie completed, in hopes of making a decent sale and profiting enough on the backend to get your “pay.” That gives you most of the risk, but it yields the greater reward. Oh, lets not forget you’re doing a lot of the jobs, so you need to be talented and proactive, and there’s also risk if your film being a bit worse since your freedom to collaborate creatively is minimized the more hats you wear and don’t hire others for. Doing things this way means you’re going to make less movies then the average full-time filmmaker, and you’ll need to do a few of them before what they make you every year is enough to truly step away from whatever else you’re doing to make another.
This has always been my plan since I started learning the realities of the market. I want to make three (two left) films under $150k (under $100k is even better) that allow me to hone my skills a bit more, improve with each one, and profit larger amounts so that by the time they’re completed and have tapered off, what they bring in on average (even after bottoming out) will be enough for a decent base income. At that point, taking a bigger risk with a film in the $250-350k range makes more sense. This also means (like I said above) that I’ll continue to wear a lot of hats. However, in doing that there’s risks, and as much as possible on the second and third film I do, I want to give up as much of them as possible on the production end. Post-production isn’t an issue, and while some might think I could benefit from having another editor, the comments and critiques of friends are more then enough to improve a product, and when you’re working on these lower budgets, sparing thousands for an editor on the front-end or (worse) back-end isn’t my idea of wisdom, not with this business model.
Now lets look at the alternative.
The alternative is what I see most other people doing. Some have a grasp of what the market can handle and want to take a risk, and others don’t. Filmmakers are throwing money at movie after movie assuming the higher production quality is going to raise their DVD sales. Most of the time this isn’t the case, and it ultimately comes down to the strength of the story, the marketability of your story and message, including cast (if that even applies), and the care with which you design your marketing campaign overall. This includes choosing the proper title with as little competition as possible on the shelf as well as online which isn’t just limited to other products with your name, but the availability of domain names, usernames on social media sites, etc. It’s easy for expensive movies to get some of these things wrong, and set themselves up for disappointment. There’s also the possibility of overshooting how many people will care about the story you’re making, which should effect how much you spent on it. People spending $250k+ have a lot more risk then people sticking to the <$150k range. Now granted, I’m assuming you’re going to do as well as the average movie in my market which means if you sold anywhere near 50,000 copies you did really well. Considering the typical distribution deal giving you a few bucks (if that), you still have a lot of catching up to do. That 50,000 will likely be sold in the first 2 years as well, so consider the timeframe here. Of course there’s always exceptions. The distribution deal you make has a heavy influence on all of this, as do foreign sales, TV broadcast, personal copies you sell, etc. Folks making movies in this budget range normally leave room for a small salary which can get them through the shoot and maybe give them a little extra (maybe). Typically the crew is bigger, most major crew positions have someone very capable, but they’re all working for modest or low rates at best. With smaller stories on much lower budgets, it can actually be easier (in my opinion) to pay people higher rates, since the amount of people to pay is fewer. It’s funny because odds are (story depending) the difference between you spending $150k and $250k won’t be much. All it takes is a few more crew positions, a better score, having more then one camera, etc. to bump up a cost that much. If you shoot it faster, that’ll change things since you can squeeze more out of your crew for the same pay. I could blog all day about the different options you have because it’s almost unlimited, but really when it comes down to it, you have a lot more money to pay back with interest.
On investor sheets, my toes scrunch up in my shoes when people try to name the Sherwood movies or Left Behind, or some other huge movies in our market as the justification for why said investor should pay for their film. When people do that I know either they’re ignorant of the realities of what they’re getting into, or they don’t have any problem using a mediocre and unbalanced example for why their film is worth investing in. I know I just stepped on some toes since everyone and their brother points to films like that as the financial success they hope to emulate. I’m not in that game. I’m not even in the theaters game, or even the Blu-ray game right now. DVD is still where it’s at for the Christian market and I can assure you we’ll be one of the last to let it go. You may bring up the technological advances in churches the last 10 years, but I would submit to you that only a small percentage of those regularly buying Christian movies go to them or run them. That’ll change, but for now DVD is the large majority of what is sold. Why does that matter? Well, lots of people justify spending (or what they plan to spend) on their movies because theaters are their goal. If you want my personal opinion, the theaters are going to become increasingly more difficult to get into, even more so then they are right now. If you want them because you want to reach outside the Christian market with your movie, then I suggest you find another market, because the Christian market probably isn’t for you. That’s not an airtight case, and there’s exceptions, but lets be honest, the large majority of those going to see distinctly Christian movies at the theaters are the Christian folks. Where are the marketing dollars spent in the first place? Besides Courageous and Soul Surfer, you haven’t really seen any mainstream advertising running things for my market, and the dollars to do it are astronomical, far outside the reach of those who don’t have a special deal with bigger studios like Sony. I’m not saying don’t spend the extra dollars just in case you end up in a theater, but at least know the likelihood that you’ll ever get there, and even if you get there know the realities of doing well or not and what that can mean for a film that’s probably too expensive already to succeed on DVD without some above average sales. Am I crushing any dreams yet? In a way I hope so, because I’m just as tired of hearing flights of fancy as I am seeing people quit because they didn’t bother to get the facts before blowing some eager wealthy mans money on their masterpiece.
The reality is, very few people actually make money in Christian market and if they do, it’s because they fit into one of few categories. A) They make a lot of movies a year, like PureFlix. B) They distribute their own movies, like Rich Christiano. C) Their budgets are so low even modest success means big profits. D) They have another job as well, which is where you’ll find most people including me. The goal is to become B more exclusively with a mix of C when it’s appropriate. I personally have no problem making smaller character driven stories my entire career. I have no aspirations of making a giant epic, or a sci-fi extravaganza, or whatever else. Thank goodness for that! To those that do, keep dreaming, and put together a solid script and business model, and then wait. For a lot of folks, waiting until the market proves it can sustain what they’re looking to do is the best option. Unless you have a really good reason to take the risk, it’s just not worth it. I’m not saying don’t take any risks, but if you’re putting everything on the line for a movie that clearly has no audience or from a financial standpoint stands almost ZERO chance of getting money back, then I say don’t do it. I say that and have said it many times to people just on principle of stewardship. I don’t care what your investor signing knowing that their risk is high, it’s not their money you’re spending. It is, but there’s a lot of more useful places for money to go then into a project that’s foolish. They’re just as responsible for giving you investment as you are for taking it in the first place. I’m not trying to point fingers, just keep that in mind when considering how much money you want to spend and on what.
What about those of you who want to work in specific positions on crew? Well, the fact of the matter is, there just isn’t enough movies being made to sustain a career right now, not if you want to work in Christian content only. For those carrying a flag for content that’s specifically Christian, it’s time to give it up. I didn’t say you had to work on something questionable, but you won’t be working on Christian movies only. Find work on other projects, because for the most part, that’s where the more experienced people are anyways. Work on a Christian project when you can get on one, but they’re few and the people interested in working on them are many.
Truthfully, and I say this as truthfully as I can, very few people make much of anything off their movies. Distributors make a decent amount and for the most part unless you get a good deal, you don’t make much, not unless your movie sells quite a few copies. You think Sherwood is making $19.99 when their movie sells at Lifeway? Think again, but even with the low amounts most larger distribution deals give, when you sell millions of copies like they do, the dollars coming back are very nice. For you filmmakers like me, the plan needs to be different. There is a way to do this and not until after my movie came out did I realize I just was lucky enough to have done it a good way, but some aren’t so lucky. Be careful, and stop looking at the huge successes of the market thinking your film will be the exception because you think God spoke to you in some dream. Cut it out. Of course God can wow and surprise us, but that’s no reason to take a ton of the facts and the way things typically work and toss them aside. Exceptions don’t remove the rule or standard, that’s why they’re exceptions. Unfortunately too many folks get too deep too fast having never given things enough thought, and they’re dead in the water faster then you can say “Name it and claim it is goofy.”
Some will take what I have to say and toss it away, and Lord knows I’ve been proven wrong before, but if this article even has some thinking harder about what they’re doing and whether or not they’ve thought it through enough then I’ll consider the post a success. There’s no straight answer to the title of this post, it’s all dependent on 1000 factors. I just hope I’ve dispelled some of the rumors and assumptions floating around out there. Yes you can make movies for a living, but many of you can’t and won’t that want to, and those that do have a long, laborious, and often lonely but (if successful) rewarding road ahead. Be smart, take good counsel, do research, have good business sense, protect your families, discern well of others before you’re waist deep in their crap, and stay alert because at every turn is sin or worldliness looking to trap you.
I hope this blabbing of mine has been helpful. If so please comment…adios!






